Pinyon Pine, a Common Tree in North America

Steve Jobs Speech A Summary - 1193 Words

Steve Jobs Speech . Summarize the content/ message of the speech. Steve Jobs chooses to present his commencement speech at Stanford in 2005 with an unpretentious, humble tone stating this is the closest he has ever gotten to his actual college graduation. This tone of unpretention and humility makes it clear the speech will not be filled with hyperbole or when I was your age platitudes. Instead the humor and humility and set the foundation for a blatantly honest journey through his life and the need to concentrate on ones passions and beliefs above all else. He takes the audience through his own academic journey, making sure to show them it was highly nonconformist in structure yet directly aligned to what mattered most to him. He said these years at Reed College helped to understand typography, which led to the development of proportionally-spaced fonts on the Apple Macintosh, a technological first. He cant resist taking a jab at Microsoft during this stage of the speech, staying like many other Apple innovations, Windows also stole this aspect of font design. The students loved it and erupt in applause and laughter. Hes clearly connected with the audience and allowed them into his life. He then progresses to discuss what death means to him, in poignant terms, prescient of his own untimely passing. He wraps up the speech by telling the audience to stay young, stay foolish and never to take anyone elses expectations as your own limits to reality. As one of theShow MoreRelatedApples Beethoven3542 Words   |  15 PagesEXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION This report will thoroughly go through the case of Apple, a company that is at the forefront of entertainment technology. Our team of expert analysts and consultants has carefully evaluated the situation of the company, determining what practices and innovations have led to its current position, developing a plan will continue to help the company further it’s position, and provide logical rationale and follow up to our plan. Before getting into the details of theRead MorePortfolio for Organizational Behavior17518 Words   |  71 Pagescomprises of the article relating to one of the 8 topics along with summary amp; analysis. I tried to analyse the problems or challenges faced by the organisation in each of the article or video or movie and relate it to the concepts learned from the course. TABLE OF CONTENT 1. Psychological Contract†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.3 2.1 Article- Pay-for-performance can be a minefield†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..†¦3 2.2 Summary amp; Analysis†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.6 2. Perception AndRead MoreStay Hungry Stay Foolish : Book Report3950 Words   |  16 PagesINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE BOOK Stay Hungry Stay Foolish comes from the desk of Rashmi Bansal, an IIM-A alumnae, who has authored several other best-sellers like â€Å"Connect the Dots†, â€Å"Share a Dream† and â€Å"Take me home†. The title of this book was inspired by Steve Job’s commencement speech at Stanford University, where he quotes the cover of the World Earth Catalog (1974),†Stay hungry. Stay Foolish.†. This book captures the success stories of 25 IIM-A graduates, who took up entrepreneurship asRead More5 Levels of Leadership by John Maxwell Essay example9610 Words   |  39 Pagesenvironment. Leaders who often encourage people will be rewarded with a workforce who strives harder to meet the leader’s positive expectation. Strike a balance between care and candor. Candor is the state or quality of being frank, open, and sincere in speech or expression. Maxwell noted that, a leader needs to balance care and candor. He says that â€Å"too much care without candor creates dysfunctional relationships, while candor without care creates distant relationships†. Many think that being a permissionalRead MoreFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 PagesDecentralized Work Sites 8 Skill Levels 8 A Legal Concern 8 Employee Involvement 20 How Organizations Involve Employees 20 Employee Involvement Implications for HRM 20 Other HRM Challenges 21 Recession 21 Off Shoring 21 Mergers 22 A Look at Ethics 22 Summary 23 Demonstrating Comprehension: Questions for Review 24 Key Terms 24 HRM Workshop 25 Linking Concepts to Practice: Discussion Questions 25 Developing Diagnostic and Analytical Skills 25 Case 1: Work/Life Balance at Baxter 25 Working with a Team:Read MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesNetworked Organizations 20 †¢ Helping Employees Balance Work–Life Conflicts 21 †¢ Creating a Positive Work Environment 22 †¢ Improving Ethical Behavior 22 Coming Attractions: Developing an OB Model 23 An Overview 23 †¢ Inputs 24 †¢ Processes 25 †¢ Outcomes 25 Summary and Implications for Managers 30 S A L Self-Assessment Library How Much Do I Know About Organizational Behavior? 4 Myth or Science? â€Å"Most Acts of Workplace Bullying Are Men Attacking Women† 12 An Ethical Choice Can You Learn from FailureRead MoreLibrary Management204752 Words   |  820 Pages. . . . . . . . . . . . 32 The Systems Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 The Contingency Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 The Learning Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Library and Information Center Management: The Historical Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Business and Ethics for Skills and Knowledge - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theBusiness and Ethics for Skills and Knowledge. Answer: Introduction Teamwork refers to a situation where all the subordinates work collaboratively utilizing their skills, knowledge and constructive feedback. Shockley-Zalabak (2014) stated that the prime benefit of team work is that the desired organizational goals and objectives can be accomplished efficiently. Killen and Dahl (2016) furthermore depicts that teamwork fosters creativity and learning, blends individual strength in order to boost creative thinking. Team work also helps in building trust and teaches conflict resolution skills and promotes a sense of ownership among all the team members. On the other hand, communication among them should also be maintained properly. Rebore (2013) depicts that effective communication enhance the probability of taking sudden actions and creates understanding. In some cases, cultural diversity becomes a benefit but Samovar et al. (2014) argued that difference and workplace harassments are also created through this difference. Thus, proper business ethics sho uld be followed that can address both the team work and communication at work effectively. In this business report, the concept of team work, team effectiveness, team performance and team communication will be represented. In the second part of the assessment, the detail about communication component of team work and relationship between communication and team effectiveness is also presented. Moreover, the concept of ethical communication in teamwork and communication ethics will also be addressed. The link between team work, communication and ethics will also be illustrated in the assessment. Reviewing team work The importance of teamwork has never been felt so strongly as in the past few decades. With the changing era, every organization, institution, firm or company knows the value and importance of teamwork. However, one must be acquainted with the term teamwork in order to proceed with its importance in the workplace or anywhere else. Teamwork is the collective action of a set of people. However, teamwork is successful when each individual in the team utilizes his or her potential to the maximum. A good team player is the one who possesses exceptional interpersonal skills and a positive attitude. In addition, he or she also has to understand the influence of the size, composition, background and construction on the group dynamics and has to realize that it alters over time (West 2012). Team effectiveness heavily relies on the performance of a team as a whole. To say that one member of the team performed brilliantly but others failed to reciprocate and that is why the team failed would be invalid. It is because teamwork involves not only individual performance but also how each member is encouraged to perform better. An effective team is the one, which is a combination of skilled members who know their roles and responsibilities clearly. In almost all the organizations today, management follows different models of team effectiveness to ensure best performance (Cooke et al., 2017). The model comprises various stages starting with the goals of the team, roles and responsibilities of each member, procedures, relationships and bond shared by the team members and leadership (Uvic.ca, 2017). Success of an organization depends on the success of a team and a team cannot achieve success unless each individual member performs. The performance of an individual in a team is directly proportional to the performance of the team as a whole. The role of the team leader becomes crucial in this regard as he or she is the one who needs to motivate the team members to perform well. In a large number of organizations today, team performances are also measured systematically assisted by data and statistics. When a team member fails to perform, the team leader is held accountable, as the entire team has to suffer (Dyer and Dyer 2013). This results in the poor performance of the organization thus making it vulnerable in the competitive market. Communication is undoubtedly the best way to create, improve and enhance a team and its performance. It is in fact the basic element of interacting with others not only within a team. A team that encourages open communication yields the best results (Shultz and Adams 2012). Teamwork is largely dependent on communication. Interacting with team members helps boost strong relationship in the team. Teamwork in the workplace has received prominent importance especially with the emergence of technological era that demands nonstop result. Organizations are discovering ways to create an atmosphere where teams can perform and deliver the best for them. It is evident from the latest developments in the world of business where recruiters demand exceptional qualities of working in a team from the prospective candidates. Teamwork has now become a qualification and individuals aspiring to compete in the market have to demonstrate this skill. Reviewing communication at work As already mentioned in the above segment, communication is an integral part of teamwork. Without communication, no team can achieve success. It however has to be understood that communication can affect teamwork either in a good or in a bad way. A team comprises different individuals who might have different ways to communicate; some might be introvert, some may be extrovert while some can be soft spoken or hard spoken. This can be realized or learned by the leader through the team effectiveness model where every member is given a chance to introduce them. Communication involves wide range of aspects. Listening and speaking are of course the two most basic components of communication. The one who listens carefully is the one who can speak fluently and convincingly. In a team, one might be a good listener or a good speaker. It is essential for an individual to be assertive and clear in what he or she wants to communicate especially in a team. Communication within teams also depends on the history shared by the team to its members within an organization. To have a smooth flow of communication, there must be transparency within the team and the leader has to ensure that no information is hidden from the team members (Schellwies 2014). Communication has been the most emphasized factor in studies that cover teamwork, team effectiveness or team performance. Most researchers have found that communication affects team performance or effectiveness largely. It is evident from the structure and functioning of reputed organizations as well, that communication has been given prominence in teamwork. Illustrations from real life could also be given where communication and teamwork played a vital role in the companys success. The biggest example can be of Google, a company that revolutionized the concept of teamwork and communication. Created by Sergey Brin and Larry Page, Google has led the list of companies that give prominence to employee satisfaction, open communication and teamwork (Lahti 2015). Apple Inc too is not far away, as it also boasts of outstanding results every year owning to its exception teamwork. These companies, along with other renowned and successful organizations prove with their success rate that communication is and has always been an integral part of teamwork. Effective teams are made effective only through effective communication. Teams can communicate on a regular basis or the communication might be limited. It has been found that while some teams perform better by communicating often, others have done well with limited communication (Eprints.qut.edu.au, 2017). This indicates that although communication is an essential part, the nature of teamwork or situations may influence the rate of communication. To say it simply, sometime, regular communication works in favor of teamwork and at other times productive but limited communication yields positive results. However, in either case, communication is needed to produce effective team results. Linking teamwork and communication with ethics Ethical communication in teamwork Tubbs (2012) furthermore depicts that ethical communication refers to the moral aspects of group interaction. The importance of ethical communication is to enhance the human worth and dignity by addressing the fairness, personal integrity, truthfulness, responsibility and self-respect. Thus, caring and responsibility for oneself illustrates the ethical communication in small groups (Killen and Dahl 2016.). There are some principles that can be applicable in a team communication. These principles are illustrated below: Truthfulness- Rebore (2013) depicted that in order to attain the integrity of communication, accuracy and honesty along with truthfulness is required. This shows that every member shared accurate information and they are working collaboratively for attaining the organizational objectives. Adapting diversity- Communication ethics also allow everyone to express their perspective without any hesitation. Ulrich and Sarasin (2012) argued that in this case, some organization faces adversity for harassment and discrimination due to difference in cultural and traditional beliefs and those people are not allowed to share their perception. However, according to ethical communication, every individual is free to express their thoughts tolerance of dissent so that the organization and managers can attain responsible decision making fundamental to a civil society (Leeuwis 2013). Advocacy- Each team member are liable to promote communication climates for enhancing mutual understanding and respect the unique needs. Killen and Dahl (2016) depicted that these members should advocate sharing information and feelings when facing significant choices along with respecting the confidentiality and privacy. Communication ethics Rebore (2013) stated that ethics in workplace involves in three levels- individual group members and group environment. Moreover, it can also be said that moral dimension relevant to interpersonal communication also refers ethics of communication. In context of a team, all team members should maintain correct balance between speaking and listening, the degree of criticism and praise and between the fear and emotional appeal. There are some fundamentals of communication ethics- responsible thinking, decision making and development of relationships and communities. Stacks and Salwen (2014) furthermore highlighted that a team member should respect all their team members and suggest them ways so that they can prosper in their working approaches. In some cases, heterogeneity also leads to conflict among each other. In such cases, the members should respect their perceptions and not shared the conflict stories with other members. This arises to the adversity of unhealthy competition and ag gressiveness in the workplace. Samovar et al. (2015) also highlighted that in communication ethics, best practices should be considered. The mangers should also listen to all the queries of each subordinate and suggest ways for improvement rather than imposing their self-thinking based on the situation. Thus, biasness should be avoided in context of communication ethics. Shockley-Zalabak (2014) also depicts that team members are allowed to speak their own experience and perspective that can be utilized by other team members as a solution of they will face the same situation. Thus, members should be allowed to express their knowledge and suggestions to others. The communication ethics also suggests that the managers or organizational leaders should avoid speaking for others and universalize their opinions, beliefs and values. They should also avoid interrupting and side conversations and adopt ways like implementation of textual communication like social media conversation. This appr oach will allow those members to express their thoughts who face difficulty in speaking in front of others. Team members on the other hand should encourage their colleagues to speak and support their thoughts in workplace. Conclusion Thus, it can be said that, team work provide many advantages to the organization like improved work effectiveness and efficiency, quick accomplishments of business objectives and enhances interpersonal relationship among the team members. It can be concluded from the assessment that in a workplace, there are many employees working together and they have to communicate with each other for obtaining their work goals. The important principle of team communication that is identified in this assessment is truthfulness, adapting diversity and advocacy. These members should seek to understand others and respect their thoughts. In some cases, there might be cases of violence and harassment as some employee does not encourage thoughts of people, who belong from other culture and tradition. Team members are also encouraged to Think and act like an owner, keep a balance in their life, communicate without fear of retribution and make and meet commitments. In such cases, the manager should implem ent process for textual communication so that everyone can express their thoughts freely. This concept expresses the communication ethics of freedom of expression. The managers n this case also suggested that they should recognize a moral issue, get the facts, evaluate the alternative actions, make a decision, taking actions and reflect on the decision. Reference List Cooke, N., Hilton, M., Science, C., Board on Behavioral, a., Education, D. and Council, N. (2017).Overview of the Research on Team Effectiveness. [online] Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK310384/ [Accessed 27 Oct. 2017]. Dyer, W.G. and Dyer, J.H., 2013.Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance. John Wiley Sons. Eprints.qut.edu.au (2017). [online] Available at: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/30311/1/Stacey_Hassall_Thesis.pdf [Accessed 27 Oct. 2017]. Killen, M. and Dahl, A., 2016. Moral judgment: Reflective, interactive, spontaneous, challenging, and always evolving. Lahti, M., 2015.Communicating interculturality in the workplace. University of Jyvskyl. Leeuwis, C., 2013. Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension. John Wiley Sons. Rebore, R.W., 2013. The ethics of educational leadership. Pearson Higher Ed. Rebore, R.W., 2013. The ethics of educational leadership. Pearson Higher Ed. Samovar, L.A., Porter, R.E., McDaniel, E.R. and Roy, C.S., 2014. Intercultural communication: A reader. Cengage Learning. Samovar, L.A., Porter, R.E., McDaniel, E.R. and Roy, C.S., 2015. Communication between cultures. Nelson Education. Schellwies, L., 2014. Critical Situations in Multicultural Teams. Challenges for Multinational Companies. Shockley-Zalabak, P., 2014. Fundamentals of organizational communication. Pearson. Shultz, K.S. and Adams, G.A., 2012.Aging and work in the 21st century. Psychology Press. Stacks, D.W. and Salwen, M.B. eds., 2014. An integrated approach to communication theory and research. Routledge. Tubbs, S.L., 2012. Human communication: Principles and contexts. Ulrich, P. and Sarasin, C. eds., 2012. Facing public interest: The ethical challenge to business policy and corporate communications (Vol. 8). Springer Science Business Media. Uvic.ca (2017). [online] Available at: https://www.uvic.ca/hr/assets/docs/od/teammodel.pdf [Accessed 27 Oct. 2017]. West, M.A., 2012.Effective teamwork: Practical lessons from organizational research. John Wiley Sons.